Prezzo di copertina: | 27,22 € |
Prezzo Kindle: | 16,90 € Risparmia 10,32 € (38%) |
Il prezzo include l’IVA | |
Venduto da: | Amazon Media EU S.à r.l. Il prezzo Kindle è stato fissato dall'editore. |
I tuoi abbonamenti
Scarica l'app Kindle gratuita e inizia a leggere immediatamente i libri Kindle sul tuo smartphone, tablet o computer, senza bisogno di un dispositivo Kindle.
Leggi immediatamente sul browser con Kindle per il Web.
Con la fotocamera del cellulare scansiona il codice di seguito e scarica l'app Kindle.
OK
Immagine non disponibile
Colore:
-
-
-
- Per visualizzare questo video scarica Flash Player
Estratto Estratto
Spin Masters: How the Media Ignored the Real News and Helped Reelect Barack Obama Formato Kindle
Amid all the breathless coverage of a non-existent War on Women, there was little or no coverage of Obama’s war on the economy—how, for instance, part-time work is replacing full-time work; how low-wage jobs are replacing high-wage ones; how for Americans between the ages of 25 and 54 there are fewer jobs today than there were when the recession officially ended in 2009, and fewer, in fact, than at any time since mid-1997.
The downsizing of the American economy wasn’t the only story the media missed—or suppressed—there was also the unraveling of Obama's foreign policy and the deadly scandals at home (Fast & Furious) and abroad (the terrorist attack that killed the American ambassador at Benghazi).
But instead of serious, substantive journalism, the media reported ad nauseam on trifles (Big Bird), Republican-baiting hysteria (how everything the Republicans said was allegedly “racial code”), and distortions of Romney’s remarks (such as the 47% comment).
The media dropped the ball in covering the 2012 election, writes David Freddoso, editorial page editor of The Washington Examiner, and in doing so the media failed in their responsibility to keep politicians honest and the public well-informed. Freddoso, a New York Times bestselling author and former congressional reporter for National Review, fills this volume not only with outrageous examples of media bias, but also with dozens of real stories that genuinely inquisitive reporters should have relished but that the overwhelmingly liberal press didn't even bother to cover.
Full of the news you didn’t hear about in 2012, David Freddoso’s Spin: How the Media Ignored the Real News and Helped Reelect Barack Obama will be the most provocative and accurate take of just how Barack Obama managed to get reelected amidst the worst economic times since at least the 1970s, and how the media helped him do it.
- LinguaInglese
- EditoreRegnery
- Data di pubblicazione29 gennaio 2013
- Dimensioni file1139 KB
Descrizione prodotto
L'autore
Dettagli prodotto
- ASIN : B00BAVM6FK
- Editore : Regnery; Illustrated edizione (29 gennaio 2013)
- Lingua : Inglese
- Dimensioni file : 1139 KB
- Da testo a voce : Abilitato
- Screen Reader : Supportato
- Miglioramenti tipografici : Abilitato
- X-Ray : Non abilitato
- Word Wise : Abilitato
- Memo : Su Kindle Scribe
- Lunghezza stampa : 274 pagine
- Recensioni dei clienti:
Informazioni sull'autore
Scopri di più sui libri dell'autore, guarda autori simili, leggi i blog dell’autore e altro ancora
Recensioni clienti
Le recensioni dei clienti, comprese le valutazioni a stelle dei prodotti, aiutano i clienti ad avere maggiori informazioni sul prodotto e a decidere se è il prodotto giusto per loro.
Per calcolare la valutazione complessiva e la ripartizione percentuale per stella, non usiamo una media semplice. Piuttosto, il nostro sistema considera cose come quanto è recente una recensione e se il recensore ha acquistato l'articolo su Amazon. Ha inoltre analizzato le recensioni per verificarne l'affidabilità.
Maggiori informazioni su come funzionano le recensioni dei clienti su AmazonLe recensioni migliori da altri paesi
I was glad Freddoso wrote about Candy Crowley's intervention in the second presidential debate in 2012. I remember the incident clearly as I was quite astonished a debate moderator stepped into the debate and attempted to "fact check" Mitt Romney with the effect of aiding the President. Whether you agreed with Obama and Crowley's assertion that Obama was in fact referring to the Benghazi attack as an "act of terror" in the Rose Garden is irrelevant. Two weeks of actions by the President and his administration that followed that speech blamed the sensational YouTube video. How do you reconcile two weeks of repeated actions attributing the attack to a video to a indirect comment in the Rose Garden? Actions speak louder than words. For the President to claim he called it an act of terror from the start is highly misleading but Crowley did her job. The American public walked away thinking Romney was wrong.
For example: in one of the debates, President Obama said he had acknowledged on the morning of Sept. 12, 2012 that Benghazi was a terrorist attack. Later we found out that on that same afternoon, he had told one of the major networks that he didn't know what it was. The network left that portion of the interview on the cutting room floor until the election. Is it important for our president to tell the complete truth?