Scarica l'app Kindle gratuita e inizia a leggere immediatamente i libri Kindle sul tuo smartphone, tablet o computer, senza bisogno di un dispositivo Kindle.
Leggi immediatamente sul browser con Kindle per il Web.
Con la fotocamera del cellulare scansiona il codice di seguito e scarica l'app Kindle.
OK
Immagine non disponibile
Colore:
-
-
-
- Per visualizzare questo video scarica Flash Player
Midnight's Furies: The Deadly Legacy of India's Partition Copertina flessibile – 15 gennaio 2017
Opzioni di acquisto e componenti aggiuntivi
- Lunghezza stampa352 pagine
- LinguaInglese
- EditoreAmberley Publishing
- Data di pubblicazione15 gennaio 2017
- Dimensioni19.9 x 3.9 x 12.9 cm
- ISBN-10144566013X
- ISBN-13978-1445660134
Spesso comprati insieme
Descrizione prodotto
Recensione
‘As a contribution to the acknowledgement of Partition’s mistakes, this book is indispensable.’ --The Sunday Times
The Partition of British-ruled India in 1947 was a momentous event in world history that has impacted the war on terror as well as the politics and economy of Asia to a degree that is still not fully understood. Nisid Hajari s book illuminates it with a rare political acuity, narrative verve, and stylistic elegance. Unraveling canonized reputations and highlighting obscure ones, he shows how a large part of humanity came into its political inheritance, and the wounds this violent process left on the body politic of India and Pakistan. Anyone wondering how nuclear-armed South Asia came to be vulnerable to religious extremism will find clear and profound answers here. --Pankaj Mishra, author ofFrom the Ruins of Empire
"
L'autore
Dettagli prodotto
- Editore : Amberley Publishing (15 gennaio 2017)
- Lingua : Inglese
- Copertina flessibile : 352 pagine
- ISBN-10 : 144566013X
- ISBN-13 : 978-1445660134
- Peso articolo : 298 g
- Dimensioni : 19.9 x 3.9 x 12.9 cm
- Posizione nella classifica Bestseller di Amazon: n. 8,763 in Libertà e sicurezza (Libri)
- n. 13,643 in Relazioni internazionali e globalizzazione (Libri)
- n. 22,226 in Storia contemporanea dal XX secolo a oggi (Libri)
- Recensioni dei clienti:
Informazioni sull'autore
Scopri di più sui libri dell'autore, guarda autori simili, leggi i blog dell’autore e altro ancora
Recensioni clienti
Le recensioni dei clienti, comprese le valutazioni a stelle dei prodotti, aiutano i clienti ad avere maggiori informazioni sul prodotto e a decidere se è il prodotto giusto per loro.
Per calcolare la valutazione complessiva e la ripartizione percentuale per stella, non usiamo una media semplice. Piuttosto, il nostro sistema considera cose come quanto è recente una recensione e se il recensore ha acquistato l'articolo su Amazon. Ha inoltre analizzato le recensioni per verificarne l'affidabilità.
Maggiori informazioni su come funzionano le recensioni dei clienti su AmazonLe recensioni migliori da altri paesi
As the conflicts in Europe flared into full-scale war, the British Army made use of Indian troops (India at this time referring to the entire country as then defined). Those troops fought alongside Britains own soldiers in battle, while on the subcontinent the two movements that would develop into the driving forces behind independence - the Indian National Congress, and the Muslim League - gained strength. Britain needed that support from India, but also saw that independence was inevitable as soon as the war ended.
The Muslim league was led by Muhammad Ali Jinnah, and the Indian National Congress was led by Jawaharlal Nehru with support and spiritual backing from Mahatma Gandhi. A great number of other leaders and key personalities also played major roles in the development of the independence movements and the subsequent partition and fighting that took place, but the personalities of Jinnah and Nehru decided many of the key positions their respective parties took during this time.
And this is what I found most interesting about this book. It seems clear, according to the author, Nisid Hajari, that the stubbornness of both Jinnah and Nehru, and the inability of those two leaders to work together for the benefit of their peoples, was perhaps the most significant single element in how the early history of these two independent countries developed.
In fact he suggests more than once that it could have been possible for a united India to have emerged at this time, if different leaders had been in place, ones who could have compromised and worked together with a much greater degree of trust and respect than what Jinnah and Nehru had for each other. This is a great shame given how history has developed in the subsequent 60+ years, particularly (I would say) for Pakistan which has been far less successful economically and politically than has India.
Another strong impression that I receive from this book is that, once Britain decided that India should be given it's independence, the involvement of Britain in helping to provide some guidance to that process, so that it could proceed peacefully and with respect to both the Hindu and Muslim peoples of India, was slim and decreased to the point where Britain essentially withdrew and simply left the people of India to their own devices.
Instead of a united and independent India, what happened was a series of violent and horrific ethnic killings, provoked by sometimes almost trivial events on both sides, that began and then escalated and finally led to such mistrust and hatred that any hope of the peoples staying together in one country were lost as a result. The descriptions of how formerly peaceful neighbors would suddenly turn on one another, simply because one was Muslim and the other Hindu, are striking and chilling. It brings to mind other similar circumstances this world has seen in other areas in subsequent years.
In interviews recently, when Hajari has been discussing this book, he has also expressed his view that the foundations for much of the current behavior of Pakistan - it's support of insurgent groups in Afghanistan for example - can be found in this early history. He suggests that Pakistan's principal preoccupation since this time has been it's historic enemy India, and that just about all of it's decisions regarding involvement in conflicts outside of Pakistan can be connected to this distrust and fear of India.
I'm not convinced about that, but in reading the book it's not at all the main point anyway. I felt that I took away from this book a much greater understanding of the events of the period of roughly 1946 through 1948 or 49. Gandhi was assassinated on January 30, 1948. Jinnah had been very ill and finally died on September 11, 1948. Nehru was the only leader of those top three to still be healthy and in power. Pakistan was running out of money and from a practical standpoint really unable to continue to pursue any aggression against India. The countries began to settle into the divided condition that persists today, with the Kashmir region still unresolved and with the area of Eastern Pakistan later splitting off in 1971 and forming the current country of Bangladesh.